Just to be clear, he was proposed to. He didn’t propose.

Prince Harry met with the public today in Sydney at the end of his secondment with the Australian army. At one point, a 21 year old woman with a MARRY ME sign clutched onto him and managed to get off a kiss. But it wasn’t just the young…      

These newish photos of Miley Cyrus remind me of how generous she usually is with the paps. If they chase her, she’ll get out of the car and give them some photos. Then she splits, and they leave her alone. Miley knows that the celeb-media relationship is often a symbiotic one. I’m not suggesting that all stars do this, but Miley does it to avoid drama.

Miley has launched a new charity called the Happy Hippie Foundation, which will “fight injustice facing homeless youth, LGBT youth, and other vulnerable populations.” She previously promoted one of these causes by asking a homeless man named Jesse to accept her Video of the Year VMA. Miley’s foundation will stick with that cause and add a few others on as well. In an interview with the AP, Miley talks about the new foundation and alludes to her own bisexuality. She talks about her newly pink armpit hair too:

Miley on her sexuality: She says not all her past relationships were “straight, heterosexual” ones but didn’t elaborate.

On homeless youth: “It’s something that everyone sees. It’s like the birds chirping. We’re consciously ignoring it at all times, but it’s always happening right in front of us.”

She calls Bruce Jenner “my hero”: “When you have all eyes on you, what are you saying? And that’s what I had to ask myself a lot. It’s like, I know you’re going to look at me more if my (breasts) are out, so look at me. And then I’m going to tell you about my foundation for an hour and totally hustle you.”

The pink armpit hair: “The pink pits are saying, ‘Don’t tell me what to do. It’s back to what I’m preaching in a way, you know, telling these kids. I’m not just saying you be yourself and I’m going to go be Miley Cyrus. I’m saying I’m going to be my (expletive) self, too.”

[From Associated Press]

Some people will inevitably think Miley’s looking for attention with a statement about her sexuality. I don’t think that’s the case here. She’s simply illustrating why the LGBT cause is important to her, and she’s speaking to youth who are struggling with their own identities. Miley emphasized that she feels comfy with her sexuality, but lots of teenagers don’t feel powerful enough in their struggles and could use some support.

Miley also released the first video from her new Backyard Sessions (the first one was arguably awesome). This series will benefit Happy Hippie Foundation. So far, Miley’s dropped a duet with Joan Jett for “Different.” I felt a little cringey watching Miley try to sound punk rock again, but her heart is in the right place.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet

Above is a video of Adam Levine signing autographs for the crowd before he was scheduled to perform with Maroon 5 on Jimmy Kimmel live yesterday. He’s flanked by three security guys. Somehow a person in the front of the crowd manages to get out a bag of sugar and dump it all over Adam’s face. (That’s at about :55 in.) Adam looks shocked, steps back and gets support from his friend, and then the security team descends on the culprit and detains him. At about 1:30 Adam angrily goes over to confront the guy but then quickly leaves.

“Your sugar. Yes, please. Won’t you come and put it down on me?” http://t.co/Y8qecHL2Y6 pic.twitter.com/aEUoQ8tbd9

— E! Online (@eonline) May 7, 2015

The unnamed assailant is in his 30s and The Hollywood Reporter claims that he “also allegedly threw a rock at Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson last week.” Maroon 5?s latest single is “Sugar” and it’s assumed that this was meant to be some kind of dumb pun.

ET Online reports that the suspect was arrested and that “Hollywood police told ET that he is a repeat offender with five victims currently pressing charges against him for battery, including Levine.”

A rep for Jimmy Kimmel Live told The Huffington Post that “Immediately after the incident occurred, Jimmy Kimmel Live security followed protocol and alerted LAPD, who responded quickly and are looking into the situation.” Maroon 5?s performance apparently went on as scheduled. Fan photos show that Levine got cleaned up and even wore the same jacket to perform.

For all the perks, advantages and free stuff celebrities get, incidents like this remind us how much of a hassle it can be too. They get recognized almost everywhere they go, they’re harassed by rude paparazzi, and some have psycho stalkers. Even with security, they can’t be protected against every scenario. This creeper reminds me of the guy who assaulted Brad Pitt, Kim Kardashian and America Ferrera at public events. Sugar is relatively harmless, and so are pies in the face, but they remind celebrities that they’re vulnerable. Where there’s a big gathering there’s potential risk involved for famous people and that must be scary. I never thought I’d have much sympathy for Adam Levine but there you go.

A photo posted by Kristal Klune???? (@kristal_klune) on May 6, 2015 at 6:54pm PDT

A photo posted by Kristal Klune???? (@kristal_klune) on May 6, 2015 at 7:00pm PDT

Played a fantastic show today @adamlevine79 @maroon5 new album is AMAZING! #UnKissMe????

A photo posted by Kristal Klune???? (@kristal_klune) on May 7, 2015 at 12:50am PDT

On Monday, Joss Whedon quit Twitter. I assumed it was because with Avengers: Age of Ultron open in all the theaters everywhere, he was finally done promoting it and so he deleted his Twitter page, which was started two years ago to promote a movie. I didn’t think much of it at first, but by the e…      

Just FYI: Jennifer Aniston’s llama sweater is Isabel Marant. These are just some assorted photos of Aniston out and about in NYC last week. She seemingly went to NYC just to hang out with friends and not to see her fiancé Justin Theroux. I don’t think Theroux was in NYC at the same time. Weird, right? But it felt like Aniston wanted to be seen all of a sudden after “going dark” for two months following the Oscars. Aniston waged one of the most aggressive Oscar campaigns in recent history, and at the end of the day, Academy voters denied Aniston a nomination. But she did get to present, so at least there’s that.

Aniston repeatedly said during her aggressive Oscar campaign that she hoped Cake would be the signal to directors and producers that she could handle more complex roles, that she wasn’t just a rom-com actress. For what it’s worth… I have issues with Jennifer Aniston, but I’ve always thought she was a gifted comedienne. She has great timing, she can deliver well-written comedic lines and she’s not afraid to look foolish for the sake of a laugh. Her attempts to be “more” than a comedic actress have always gotten her into trouble. So… I for one was hoping that Cake would not bring her a truck full of drama scripts. And it hasn’t. It looks like Aniston’s first post-Cake film will be… a sequel to Mean Girls?!

New Line Cinema is setting Sean Anders to direct Mean Moms, and is targeting a summer start date for a film that has Jennifer Aniston eyeing the female-driven comedy. They worked together in Horrible Bosses 2 at New Line.

Mean Moms matches the spirit of Mean Girls with an adult cast. A happily married mother of two who moves from small-town America to the high–class suburbs suddenly must confront the cutthroat world of competitive parenting. Jill Messick is producing with Offspring Entertainment partners Jennifer Gibgot and Adam Shankman. Aniston doesn’t have a deal at this point and insiders in her camp said she has other options this summer, so stay tuned on this one.

Like Mean Girls, this movie is based on advice books written by Rosalind Wiseman. This film is based on Queen Bee Moms And King Pin Dads: Dealing With The Parents, Teachers, Coaches, And Counselors Who Can Make — or Break — Your Child’s Future; Mean Girls was based on Queen Bees And Wannabes. It isn’t precisely clear what role Aniston will play or if it will be closer in spirit to Rachel McAdams or Lindsay Lohan.

[From Deadline]

This has the potential to be really good and really funny. I hope that Aniston doesn’t get cast as the fish-out-of-water Lohan character. It would be much funnier (and truer to her real personality) if she was cast as the Queen Bee of the cool moms, the McAdams character. There’s a Mommy Mafia in LA and Aniston is very much aligned with that group (despite the fact that she doesn’t have kids). That’s who she is – she’s the “you can’t sit with us” Queen Bee.

Photos courtesy of PCN, Fame/Flynet and WENN.

Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Martin were at a benefit for Nepal together last night in Hollywood, leaving through separate doors. A few hours earlier, PEOPLE reported that the two are “happier than ever” now that she has some down time. Chris has apparently been making an effort to get to know her…      

Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Martin were at a benefit for Nepal together last night in Hollywood, leaving through separate doors. A few hours earlier, PEOPLE reported that the two are “happier than ever” now that she has some down time. Chris has apparently been making an effort to get to know her…      

I have a renewed respect for Sofia Vergara with the way she’s handling the Nick Loeb situation. Loeb is SO THIRSTY. Loeb is currently suing Sofia, his ex-fiancée, for “custody” of the embryos they created while they were together. Loeb has also been waging an uncomfortably stalkerish campaign against Sofia in the press, basically accusing her of being an awful person because she didn’t and doesn’t want to have babies with him and he’s come thisclose to accusing her of child abandonment because she simply wants to their mutually-agreed-upon contract to be honored.

Earlier this week, Sofia appeared on Howard Stern’s show and of course Stern asked her about the situation. I’m paraphrasing, but Sofia was basically like “We have a valid contract and why doesn’t he just make a baby with someone else?” Then today, Sofia appeared on a pre-taped Good Morning America interview. And she goes even harder.

Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb squared off on the morning talk shows Thursday in their battle over their frozen embryos – with the Modern Family actress labeling her ex-fiancé an opportunist and Loeb claiming he just wants protect two lives that “have already been created.”

Vergara, 42, told Good Morning America that the embryos are a non-story, legally speaking, and she criticized Loeb, 39 – and the press – for bringing a private matter into the public eye.

“I’ve been working very hard for 20 years to get to this point where I am,” she said. “I promote all my movies, all my work, but I don’t like promoting my private life. And I don’t want to allow this person to take more advantage of my career and try to promote himself and get press for this.”

She seemed dumbfounded about why Loeb is getting any press – much less a New York Times op-ed – about the matter. The two signed an agreement, after all, that both must consent in order to bring to term the embryos they created together when they were a couple in 2013.

“Why is the press allowing somebody to invent things and create press for himself?” she asked. “He’s not an actor. He’s not a celebrity. It’s like, why?” She added: “This shouldn’t be out there for people to give their opinion when there’s nothing to talk about. There’s papers signed … I don’t understand why the media is allowing a person to just try to put me down, and make it like something is happening when nothing is happening.”

On Today, meanwhile, Loeb said he never believed Vergara “was going to change her mind” about the embryos, and that he’d be happy to raise the kids as a single father.

“It has nothing to do with whether it’s her baby or a baby,” he said. “Lives were already created … I wouldn’t toss them aside.”

He’s not asking Vergara to take financial responsibility for the children, he added. “I’ve offered to her to waive all financial responsibilities,” he said. “I want these children to have the best lives possible … There’s nothing more that I want to do than bring these children to life.”

In closing, both of them claimed they’re not overly bitter about what’s happening.

“I think Sofia is a wonderful, wonderful woman,” Loeb said. “I don’t hate her at all.”

For her part, Vergara mentioned how happy she is with Joe Manganiello, and how blessed she is to have such a successful career. “I’m not sad. I’m grateful,” she said. “I have to enjoy what I’m living right now.”

[From People]

God, Loeb is such a manipulative, craven tool. And Sofia is – I feel – reading the situation correctly. There’s a valid contract. The end. Except the whole story has become a toxic blend of celebrity, politics, reproductive law, and media bias. Loeb wants it that way too, because this whole thing feels like he’s trying to “punish” Sofia for breaking up with him. It’s gross. And I’m glad she’s standing up for herself.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

I know that I always start articles all “go watch this then come back”. And I also know that sometimes there’s just not time. I do it too. Sometimes I just read the article about the thing instead of watching the thing.

But if you don’t watch this episode of Amy Schumer, you will have missed …      

I know that I always start articles all “go watch this then come back”. And I also know that sometimes there’s just not time. I do it too. Sometimes I just read the article about the thing instead of watching the thing.

But if you don’t watch this episode of Amy Schumer, you will have missed …